Toolbox
RPCs
Subgraphs
Load Balancer
Contributor
Providers
EAS
ToolboxRPCsSubgraphsLoad BalancerContributorProvidersEASOthers

Compare Filecoin Onchain Cloud vs Rubic MCP Servers providers

This page compares Filecoin Onchain Cloud and Rubic across MCP Servers provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: Filecoin Onchain Cloud, Rubic.

104 providers and 122 plans to compare
104
Offer
Server Type
Hosting Type
Transport Type
MCP Endpoint
Auth Type
Credential Key
Self-Hosted Command
Self-Hosted Args
Required Env Vars
x402
On-Chain Write
Agent Skills
Tags
Description
Plan
Plan
Price
Trial
Trial
Minimize Sidebar
Filecoin Onchain Cloud
FOC CLI MCP
services
Self-hosted
stdio
None
npx
-y, foc-cli, --mcp
No
Yes
file-upload, file-retrieval, dataset-management, piece-management, provider-discovery, balance-query, storage-pricing, payment-processing
Filecoin, Filecoin Onchain Cloud, Storage, PDP, USDFC
Public
$0 software; mainnet storage and network fees
No
GitHubDocs
Rubic
docs
Hosted
http
https://docs.rubic.finance/mcp
None
No
No
documentation-search, api-reference, developer-guidance
Rubic, cross-chain, bridge, documentation, AI agents
Free
$0
No
WebsiteDocs
chain.love

chain.love

LinkedInXTelegramGitHub
DocumentationWhitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE